Jump to content

Atomic

Members
  • Joined

Everything posted by Atomic

  1. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
  2. Had to shake it up facing elimination. I'm surprised both Kulikov and Morrow are coming in but they will have fresh legs and maybe that's the extra zip we need. Morrow was a key player in round one and actually has a pretty good shot from the point... we desperately need some depth scoring today
  3. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Is Leggett practicing?
  4. Cam Marshall failed his physical... lingering injury
  5. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Yeah they traded David Foucault for him. Now both play for the Lions.
  6. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Blue Bombers projected (by me) 2018 training camp depth chart:
  7. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    What is a legitimate way? Did you read the article?
  8. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Yes that's right.
  9. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Biggest addition of the offseason and it's not even close.
  10. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
  11. So you're a Coyote fan who comes in with a Knights profile pic. You're here to troll, stop acting innocent.
  12. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Bighill would totally transform the defence. Getting him on the day before training camp would be a huge boost. Awesome news but I won't get too excited til the announcement is official....
  13. So how many American reporters are going to be covering Ticats camp now? It's going to be a zoo over there all season. I'm excited to see what Johnny Football can do in the CFL. Whether he dominates, fizzles out, or fails spectacularly I'm sure it will be fun to watch.
  14. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    The majority of people dying at the Gaza border are Hamas terrorists. Is Israel not allowed to defend itself? https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/i-said-israel-should-be-ashamed-of-its-actions-on-the-gaza-border-now-i-am-the-one-who-is-ashamed-1.464233?platform=hootsuite
  15. Yes it is a requirement so leave
  16. Ehlers has to score tonight
  17. I think it's implied to be a failure on management's part when a QB with Marve's qualifications and injury history is brought in. I liked Marve as a person and respected his drive but he simply had no business starting a pro football game. He squeezed out the win in 2014 (though he is not credited with a W) but when he started a game in 2015 it was painfully obvious... the man had no experience and simply couldn't read a defence. Maybe that's a little harsh but it's true. He had a big arm and good speed but it's all for naught if you can't think the game.
  18. Fair point considering some of the guys who have come through.... but really... Marve started like ten games in his whole college career, was more broken than Buck Pierce, and couldn't read a defence to save his life. He had no business being in professional football. However
  19. Marve...... really? Maybe the most unqualified QB to come through here in the last decade. Great athlete... no clue how to play quarterback.
  20. Atomic replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I believe our good friend @Mark F was simply imagining the possibility of Ross/Streveler turning out well and how nice that would be.
  21. No we're not doing predictions.
  22. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    I get what you're saying, but how do I know it actually happened if it is never proven?
  23. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Dirty tactic but not really unique to Trump. I don't approve, but at the same time, no one's right to vote is being taken away. If proven in a court of law, yes it would.
  24. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    OK fair enough. So you don't like that Trump doesn't hide who he is. That doesn't bother me and so is not a redline. And those are all personal concerns, which to me, don't mean a thing. So no, none of those are a redline. Now, if he started implementing policies banning homosexuality or taking away the right to vote from women or black people, yes that would be a redline. But otherwise, sorry... don't care.
  25. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Sure, it doesn't matter much to me, he won and it's over and done with now. I'm not sure what you mean when you say "what's your red line?" That's a pretty open question. I could answer with "Invading Canada" if I wanted to, but of course that is unrealistic. Maybe be more specific with what you mean, and I could come up with something.