Jump to content

Atomic

Members
  • Joined

Everything posted by Atomic

  1. Atomic replied to Ducky's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Is your memory that short??? He got called up for 10 games at the end of last season. 2014 4th round pick. RHD.
  2. Atomic replied to Ducky's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Like, right now? Or always?
  3. True but consider the circumstances. Would you prefer an even worse goalie for less money? Or sign an unproven guy like Raanta or Darling to a long term, big money deal and essentially give up on Hellebuyck? It's not an easy decision to make.
  4. Atomic replied to Ducky's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Lol. No no I got that. But he's not still recovering from minor knee surgery in 2016. He got knee surgery in 2016, yes. Then after he was healed up sufficiently, he got hip surgery. Then he was healthy and suffered an unrelated lower body problem after 11 games in 2016-17, plus his family problems. He was mostly healthy by the end of 2017 and was starting to skate. So the fact that he's still "progressing" isn't really surprising. Of course, that's some pretty sketchy injury history and your point still stands about there being questions on D.
  5. Joe Burnett probably shouldn't be playing cornerback at this point.
  6. Atomic replied to Ducky's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    I think you might be getting a little mixed up when it comes to Myers' injury history.
  7. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Meanwhile the guys we get rid of are off winning Stanley Cups with other teams
  8. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Well I've never read the book but that doesn't mean I can't read!!
  9. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Maurice.
  10. Yes but you have to hit 100 Likes in one day before the Dislike button appears.
  11. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    He must read this forum.
  12. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    @Mark F Never read the book but I really liked the movie.
  13. **** the rules! I'm Chris Jones *****!
  14. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Other than their stance on gay marriage what other values are outdated?
  15. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Say what now?
  16. Atomic replied to Mr Dee's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    That's exactly what I said!!! But I believe it constitutes a catch when he is able to plant and pivot and begin taking a step in the other direction.
  17. Atomic replied to Mr Dee's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    He did though. Just not after the pivot. He caught the ball, took a step backwards, pivoted on that foot, took half a step and got blown up.
  18. I'm just a worrier I guess. That's why my friends call me Whiskers.
  19. Atomic replied to Mr Dee's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Looked like a catch and fumble to me. Caught it, turned and took a step. That's a catch and a fumble, IMO.
  20. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Yeah probably. I just think you go out and find the six best defencemen and let them play. Overall talent level is more important than which side they play on. I honestly think if you threw Buff on the left side he would thrive there. A guy with a shot like his would absolutely crush it in the offensive zone on his off-side.
  21. I guess they saw Jake Thomas filling in on the OL one too many times and have decided to not let that happen again.
  22. I have some faith in Carmichael but two rookies on the field side does have me a little worried...
  23. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Never said it doesn't matter. I said they make it work everywhere else which isn't a matter of opinion, it's fact. Of course guys prefer to play their correct side, I'm saying it's not as big a deal as we make it out to be here.
  24. Atomic replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    So basically you trust them more because you agree with their bias. Look at it from the opposite side: "I'll trust more of what FOX says than CNN because it sets off Obama & his surrogates which tells me they're much more on point than CNN"