Rod Black

I just kicked three riderfans out of my house. They had watermelons on their heads, they came with no beer or booze, the pregnant one wanted to drink my rum.

Bwaa ha ha...love the gif!

It is what it is. Sometimes funny. And there's always Bob Irving.

Lots of seats at riderville. Could include resale.

I think it would be a hoot in a strange twist of irony if Lankford scores a touchdown by a long bomb, as well as a second TD on a kick off return.

I said Stop it.

That's very funny. I like it.

I like the comparison. This week to week 2. Glenn has not shown capacity to sustain the performance he has in the past two gamesfor many more games. Its the defence that is keeping the green squad competitive.

You have no idea the value of getting someone to produce a referenced quote. and now your piling on. So stop it.

In my opinion, that is the problem when interlopers arrive at a site with a declared intent of "throwing mud" characterized by wanting to mix it up. It is a precursor to escalated ill will. Always has been. And even in your apology, you are rationalizing your derogatory comments.

Final comment Rich. The comment might have been easy to miss, but I am offended by scarcz71 references to my dead mom.

There is no entitlement in my mind Mike. What's missing is the post that somehow justified a painting of those that oppose two specific Rider Fans as applying to all fans from other teams. Why not say you or whoever are out of line in a x reason as per the TOS? Had I chosen to grab a post that I assume the OP was referring to, shame on me for not using fact because if it's not the correct one and that is not prudent to advancing a view. i made a reply to Atomic that clarified my questions. Trolls are referenced in the terms of service, and as that is your decision to ban or not, it follows that you know what the rules are. The TOS defines a troll as someone looking for an arguement. The OP referred to me as a troll, but failed to admit accountability for the assertion. The bahaviour of some posters that is down right embarrassing to you is yours to control. You have the authority to use it. Comparing elements from the Rider site is used as an example. But there are posters here that challenge rivals and without the challenges, the discussion, the abuse to bomber fans would be greater than it is. Ok, so I'm not entitled to ask someone to justify their assertions. I acknowledge the warning. i apologize to Thehedra as well.

Bear pants, I was responding to Atomic with that post. And there is still no post that the OP claims justifies a sermon.

He's taunting. No doubt in my mind. No sign of goodwill discussion from him.

Id say he's baiting you speedflex. And he's rude.

If the poster was claiming Mikes authority to post, they need to show it. There is no "Mikes post" that says what was inferred by the threads original poster.

Which confirms your observations.

That's a great reply!

Condescending, insincere. Inaccurate characterization. Whining. Victim card. Mischaracterisation, then victim. Needless affiliation. Condescending again, moral apprehension. Fained understanding. There. Each one of your sentences is described by content. And you wonder way folks don't like what you say.

You did wash every one that has disagreed with scarcros71 and Ripper with the brush that paints them as unwelcoming fiends. You invalidated their concerns. You did it by trying to interpret Mikes post on a brand new thread for emphasis. You have failed to produce or confirms Mikes post. Which of Mikes posts were you referring to!

"And riderfans, they would never disparage a bomber fan. Not them. Never."

Many opposing fans are welcomed. Atlantic Rider fan is a good respected fellow. Lying guy is a hoot! Zontar is fine, And I feel very bad for his team. Bluto fantastic. Thehedra, kindly be specific.

Biggjay, is that the post that Thehedra is speaking of? Thehedra, can you confirm?

I'd like to see the post your speaking of. Paraphrasing doesn't help me.

And which post of Mikes are you referring to?